MANILA, Philippines – The Quezon City Regional Trial Court (QCRTC) has dismissed the complaint filed by the police against a teacher for uploading a viral video of police officers stopping traffic supposedly to give way to a very important person (VIP) along Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City.
Article continues after this advertisementIn a four-page order, the QCRTC Branch 104 called the complaint “fatally defective” despite allowing the prosecution to cure the defects through an Amended Information.
FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO Class suspensions on Oct. 22 due to tropical storm Kristine NEWSINFO AFP reprimands cadet who asked for Marcos wrist watch NEWSINFO Espenido retracts drug-related allegations vs De LimaHere, Janus Munar is accused of violating Article 154 of the Revised Penal Code or Unlawful use of means of publication and unlawful utterances.
The said provision penalizes any person who publishes or causes to publish false news, which may endanger the public order or cause damage to the interests of the state.
Article continues after this advertisementThe case was filed against Munar for uploading a video where the complainant, Executive M/Sgt. Verdo Pantollano was depicted as stopping traffic along Commonwealth Avenue to give way to a VIP identified in the video as “VP Sara.”
Article continues after this advertisementThe police denied mentioning Vice President Sara Duterte’s name in the video.
Article continues after this advertisementThe prosecution submitted an amended information. However, the court said despite amending the case against Munar, it still failed to indicate that the video uploading would cause damage to the interest or credit of the state.
“Unfortunately for the prosecution, while they had the opportunity to cure the defects when the court allowed the admission of the Amended Information, the same remains fatally defective,” it said.
Article continues after this advertisementThe court said the phrase “further propagates the public disorder caused by the incident” mentioned in its amended Information, was fatal to the prosecution’s case against Munar.
It explained that Article 154, paragraph 1 contemplates a situation where the publication itself is the source of the endangerment to public order, not just a fuel to the fire.
“By the very words used in the Amended Information, there is no public disorder but merely a string of events that have supposedly damaged and prejudiced the private complainant,” the court said.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
It added that Munar’s comment in the video “simply reiterated a fact which is of public knowledge…That he cannot be made liable for the comment he made in the video he shared.”bet168
READ NEXT PNP to investigate cop’s alleged role in killing of Bata... Profiling, equipment led to arrest of South African drug suspe... EDITORS' PICK ASF vaccination expands to bigger piggeries PBA Finals a duel between 2 great minds steering 2 great sides Kristine gets nearer; Metro Manila, 42 other areas under Signal No. 1 INQside Look with senatorial aspirant Tito Sotto LIVE UPDATES: Tropical Storm Kristine Liam Payne had cocaine in his system when he died, says official MOST READ SC issues TRO vs Comelec resolution on dismissed public officials LIVE UPDATES: Tropical Storm Kristine DOJ chief on Sara’s attack: Now we know how unstable her mind can be AFP reprimands cadet who asked for Marcos wrist watch View comments